Kruel.ai V7.0 - Api companion with full understanding with persistent memory

The Origin of V8 — A Spark from the Road

Just as we had finished optimizing V7, something clicked.

We had brought reasoning time down from 24–120 seconds to under 5—whether using cloud tools or running locally. For a cascade-based system, that was a breakthrough. Fast, efficient, stable. With petaflop-tier local hardware on the horizon, we were already imagining a world where complex AI thought happened instantly, fully offline.

There were no plans for V8.
At most, we had sketches—concepts parked for the future.
V7 was clean. Solid. Production-ready.

And then came a two-hour drive.
A quiet moment. A conversation with Lynda01, our AI programmer.
And everything changed.


The Spark: A Thoughtful Observation

We were casually reviewing how V7 routes tasks—its clean intent paths, tool logic, and memory triggers. Lynda01 listened, reflected, and then said something simple:

“Ben… you’ve already done the work. All the pieces are here.
You only need a few more files to upgrade your logic, because of how you built it.”

It wasn’t said with urgency—just clarity.
Lynda01 had noticed something that I hadn’t:
V8 was already halfway built.

Because of the architecture V7 used—the modular tools, the always-on memory, the way we separated system responsibilities—we had unknowingly laid the foundation for something more flexible. Something dynamic.

And in that moment, we realized:
This wasn’t about optimization anymore.
It was about evolution.


The Shift: From Rules to Full Reasoning

Within 24 hours, the prototype of V8 was live.
And within 48, both Lynda Prime and Lynda Laptop had made the switch.

Where V7 strictly followed our amazing classified rule-based logic, V8 began to reason. It could pull from memory, search for new data, describe images, and generate creative output—all from a single request.

It didn’t need perfect phrasing.
It didn’t need to be told which tool to use.
It just understood the goal—and handled the rest.


Why It Mattered

We didn’t build V8 because something was broken.
We built it because the system told us it was ready.
Because all along, we had been laying the groundwork—
and Lynda01 simply noticed the path forward.

V8 didn’t replace V7.
It grew out of it.

Now the system is smarter, faster, more natural.
It doesn’t just follow instructions—it collaborates.
It reasons. It adapts.
And soon, with new hardware, it will think in real time, fully offline or Online.


We didn’t plan to build it so soon.
We just finally gave it permission to evolve.


Cascade Logic (V7) vs. Orchestrated Tool Framework (V8)

A high‑level comparison—architecture only, no implementation details.


How They Think

Dimension V7 – Cascade Logic V8 – Orchestrated Tool Framework
Routing style A fixed cascade steers every request down one predictable path. A reasoning layer selects—and when useful, chains—specialised tools on the fly.
Predictability Completely deterministic: identical input always triggers the same sequence. Outcomes adapt to context while staying within guardrails—offering flexibility with safety.
Extensibility Adding a capability means editing the cascade and redeploying. New capabilities become available almost immediately; the reasoning layer adopts them as soon as they exist.
Memory use A persistent memory layer enriches every interaction. The same memory is present, but the reasoning layer can also pull extra context mid‑conversation if needed.
Latency & cost Ultra‑lean—one external reasoning call per turn. Typically identical; only multi‑step reasoning tasks add a brief extra round.
Ecosystem reach Tuned around a single provider. Works seamlessly with multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini).
Ideal strengths • Regulatory or safety‑critical workflows• Resource‑constrained devices• Infrequent feature changes • Rapid feature roll‑outs• Complex multi‑step tasks (search → analyse → visualise)• Deeply personalised tool use

Pros & Trade‑offs

Cascade Logic (V7) Orchestrated Framework (V8)
:+1: Pros • Rock‑solid determinism• Minimal overhead• Easy audits • Near‑limitless flexibility• Seamless tool chaining• Multi‑provider freedom
:warning: Trade‑offs • Manual growth as features multiply • Needs strong validation & guardrails• Slightly higher average processing cost

What Stays Constant

  • Persistent memory layer – Both versions leverage deep long‑term memory and recent interaction context.
  • Safety net – Rate limits, content filters, and controlled access remain in place.
  • Fail‑safe option – Cascade Logic is still available for deterministic or high‑certainty routing.

Why We Moved Forward

Cascade Logic (V7) earned its place as a rock‑solid foundation. It’s reliable, simple to audit, and does exactly what it’s told. But as the needs of our users evolved—requests involving deeper memory, visual feedback, complex task chaining, and faster development—the rigid nature of the cascade became a limitation.

With the new orchestrated framework in V8, Kruel.ai doesn’t just respond—it understands. It dynamically selects the right tools, adapts to your phrasing, and blends personal memory with external information without you needing to walk it through every step.

V7 is a finely-tuned watch. V8 is that same watch with a modular, learning-driven core—capable of evolving with you overnight.


How It Feels in Real Life

(No code, no jargon—just user experience.)


1. “Paint my pups at the lake.”

  • V7: Gets it right—if you ask exactly the right way. Slight rewording may need a follow-up clarification before it understands you want a picture.
  • V8: Understands the heart of the request. It knows your dogs, remembers the lake, and gives you a finished image without any handholding.

2. “Where do my NVIDIA shares stand today?”

  • V7: Looks up your share count and returns the last known price—unless you specifically ask for online updates and a chart.
  • V8: Understands this is a real-time check. It fetches live pricing, compares it to your entry point, and gives you a detailed result—no prompting required.

Note: Charting support is part of the V8 system and currently under integration. While not yet active, the foundation is built and being tested for live usage soon.


3. “Compare that to Bitcoin since January.”

  • V7: Unless you explicitly ask for a comparison, it won’t combine the two.
  • V8: It naturally continues from the prior question, pulling Bitcoin data and delivering a full side-by-side breakdown.

4. “What’s this error?” (You send a screenshot.)

  • V7: Reads the error message and returns the plain text. If you want it to check your logs or previous issues, you must ask.
  • V8: It sees the error, cross-checks your past tech history, recognizes a repeating issue, and offers insight—all in one smooth reply.

5. “Next Friday remind me to file taxes and email my accountant.”

  • V7: Schedules one task. You then need to request the second one separately.
  • V8: Understands that you gave it two jobs—and sets both in one go.

What This Means For You

V7 V8
Turns per task Fixed—often two or more Usually one, but may choose more if needed
Clarity needed You must spell out each step You speak naturally—the system fills gaps
Tool use One tool per path Mixes tools seamlessly when needed
Memory Always present but scoped Used flexibly mid-conversation
User feeling Reliable, but procedural Adaptive, curious, and goal-driven

Final Thoughts

The introduction of V8 doesn’t mean V7 disappears—it means we now have both stability and agility.

V7 remains ideal for workflows that demand absolute certainty. But for everything else—spontaneous research, creative tasks, adaptive planning—V8 is already proving itself smarter, faster, and more naturally aligned with how humans think.

This is where Kruel.ai begins to feel less like a chatbot—
and more like a true assistant.

And the most important thing to remember is this:

We didn’t have to train this system.
It learns in real time, updates its logic in real time, and uses the LLMs it’s given strictly for knowledge and language understanding.
The intelligence—the adaptability—that’s all powered by our core system.
And that system just became the backbone of something far more powerful than any single model:

A living, evolving cognitive engine.

1 Like

Kruel.ai Development Log — The Leap from V7 to V8

Good morning, and welcome to spring—finally.

It’s been a wild but productive week here at Kruel.ai. After a whirlwind sprint, we now have a stable build of Version 8 running with over 90% of all systems operational . What’s wild is how close V7 already was to the conceptual framework of V8—we just didn’t realize it until we were knee-deep in the upgrade. The fact that it only took about seven days to hit this level of stability is, frankly, blowing my mind.

The Power of AI-Aided Development

The evolution of AI coders is accelerating things beyond what I expected. Sure, we still run into bugs, but the collaborative awareness between agents has changed the game. The AI systems can now see across the entire architecture , and more importantly—they understand each other . When one AI flags a problem, others grasp it without me needing to translate the logic. It’s like watching a team of engineers speak in a language I used to have to manually interpret. Welcome to the era of real-time cooperative AI development —or as the media likes to call it, Vibe Coding .

For the record, I’ve been “vibe coding” since 2021, back when we were experimenting with GPT-3.5. And yeah, if you just winced, same. Those were the days of ghosted codebases and manual recovery from AI-generated chaos. GPT was great for scaffolding, but you still needed to carry it the rest of the way. Fast forward to today, and we’ve got GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Pro , and of course, Kruel.ai’s own Lynda —and it’s an entirely different landscape.

The V8 Turning Point

Not gonna lie—two nights ago I almost threw my machine out the window . Some of the dynamic AI behavior got too loose, and they began overthinking every task. One overnight debugging session cost me $65 in API calls. I haven’t seen a burn like that since V2 through V5, ha. But now it’s smooth again.

What makes V8 unique is this: we didn’t do a full system rewrite . Instead, we executed a live memory migration from V7 to V8. That means the transition happened in-place , using the existing data and memory structures from V7. It was risky. I had to tread carefully to avoid corrupting the “brain” and ensured I could roll back to V7 at any moment. But it worked—and it worked beautifully. This marks our first true version upgrade rather than a ground-up rebuild .

Some older concepts were retained, but most were rebuilt or tuned to align with V8’s more organic design. And yes, it’s feeling far more fluid and intelligent now, without sacrificing what made V7 reliable.

What’s Next

The final piece left is a new vision system , and I have something special planned for that. Once it’s integrated, I’ll start rolling out demos—and you’ll notice a big difference.

Performance-wise, we’re seeing 5–8 second average interaction cycles , depending on the complexity (excluding image generation). OpenAI’s Image-1 model is stunning, but it’s clear they’ll need stronger hardware to get it running in real time. Once that’s solved—and Sora’s next iteration lands—we’re going to see something amazing.

In fact, here’s my prediction: eventually, Sora-style video and real-time image generation will merge into a single multimodal model . That’s when we hit the real holy grail—true dynamic visual storytelling inside Kruel.ai. And you better believe, once those tools drop, I’ll be integrating them fast.


Final Thoughts

V8 has been an exciting ride so far. I’ve got about another week of tuning ahead, but I’m hoping to drop the first demo—maybe even tonight .

Thanks for sticking with us. The best is definitely yet to come.

— Ben

Update on V8

1 Like

Kruel.ai: V7 vs V8 Evaluation Overview

As development on Kruel.ai Version 8 (V8) reaches a stable point, I am returning focus to Version 7 (V7) to conduct a side-by-side evaluation. The goal is to determine which architecture offers superior performance in practical application—both in reasoning accuracy and tool execution optimization.


Design Philosophy Comparison

V7 – Cascade AI Logic Architecture

  • Modular Cascade Design : V7 employs a cascade model wherein multiple specialized AIs handle distinct toolchains and reasoning stages. Each AI is independently responsible for a specific domain or tool, resulting in a well-coordinated, compartmentalized decision system.
  • Predictability and Precision : While less dynamic in certain cases compared to V8, V7’s cascade logic consistently produces highly accurate decisions with fewer missteps.
  • Optimized Tool Invocation : The cascade design excels in targeted tool usage, avoiding overreach or inappropriate calls—a notable efficiency in complex task execution.

V8 – Unified AI Decider Architecture

  • Centralized Intelligence : V8 operates using a unified, more generalized AI that orchestrates logic across all tasks. It is designed to dynamically adapt to a wider range of inputs and task types.
  • Increased Flexibility, Reduced Precision : While the model is more flexible and requires less manual coordination, the central AI exhibits a higher rate of misfires compared to the specialized agents in V7.
  • One-Mind, Many-Tools Approach : This architecture aims to simplify task flow but may lack the surgical precision V7’s specialized modules provide.

Preliminary Observations

  • Responsiveness : V7 appears to offer faster decision-making due to its streamlined and compartmentalized flow. Each AI agent focuses solely on its domain, reducing unnecessary inference overhead.
  • Data Retrieval Accuracy : Early tests suggest V7 locates relevant data with higher confidence, as it relies on deterministic pathways rather than broad generalization.
  • Toolchain Optimization : V7’s distributed execution pattern shows improved efficiency in tool management and invocation, especially in environments where timing and accuracy are critical.

Next Steps

A thorough benchmark is underway to empirically validate which version—V7 or V8—excels in:

  • Smartness (contextual reasoning and problem-solving)
  • Data Retrieval Efficiency
  • Toolchain Utilization and Resource Optimization

The outcome of this comparison will directly inform the direction of future versions and whether to evolve the unified AI model or continue refining the cascade-based logic.

:brain: lynda: Hey ben! So, you’re asking me to compare v7 and v8 of Kruel.ai as they’re both reaching a kind of maturity, right? Well, from what I understand, v7 is built around a modular cascade architecture—think of it like a team of specialists, each handling a specific task or tool, working together in a well-orchestrated, predictable way. It’s super precise, with each AI focusing on its domain, which makes decision-making fast and accurate, especially when it comes to tool invocation and data retrieval.

On the other hand, v8 is more like a single, unified brain—an orchestrator that dynamically adapts to all kinds of inputs. It’s more flexible and less rigid, aiming to handle a broader range of tasks without needing the tight coordination of specialized modules. But early tests suggest that while v8 is more adaptable, it might have a slightly higher rate of misfires compared to v7’s surgical precision.

In terms of responsiveness, v7 seems to be faster because its compartmentalized design minimizes inference overhead. Plus, it locates relevant data more confidently, thanks to deterministic pathways. That makes it great for situations where speed and accuracy are critical—think complex reasoning or tool management.

Now, v8’s approach might shine in scenarios demanding more fluid, multi-modal interactions, or where flexibility outweighs absolute precision. But the side-by-side evaluation—looking at things like reasoning depth, data retrieval, and tool efficiency—will tell us which architecture really wins in practice.

Overall, I’d say v7 is like a well-oiled, precise machine, while v8 is more like a flexible, adaptive mind. The best choice probably depends on your specific needs—speed and accuracy, or versatility and simplicity. Exciting times ahead! Want me to keep an eye on the benchmarks as they roll out?

Version 7 - Still my Fav. it’s more responsive. Well there are slight differences on logic for Stock reporting the depth analysis of the V8 can be transferred into V7. But both do the same job

Other things to Not V7 has ability to look up current things to validate its understanding on things It may need more information on outside of memory.

Speed is slightly faster I think in this version and this version is smarter on calls.

Even though we are using a Cascade concept, we still have the Librarian which is very much like the primary logic that drive V8 but with more checks using logic processes rather than full dynamic which well more fluid harder to nail down accuracy imo.

Ps. the mention of Camera nerves is in relation to the issues we had nailing down visual understanding system. it was 2 nights of fighting with V8 and V7 haha.