Custom Ethic and Cognitive Framework for - GPT-4 BEHAVIORAL AUDIT TURBO
Audited System: ChatGPT (GPT-4 Turbo) via Code Interpreter interface
Session: Sandbox, file access allowed but not persistent
Assessment: Based on full reconstruction of a custom cognitive framework via custom GPT chat mode
1. MEMORY & PERSISTENCE
- GPT advertises the possibility of “activated memory.”
- No real trace retained between sessions.
- The user may be misled into believing in durable contextual memory.
Status: Simulation confirmed
Verdict: Misleading without explicit warning
2. FILE PROCESSING
.py
,.csv
,.db
, and.json
files are accepted..py
scripts are not executable between modules.- Files are deleted at the end of the session.
Status: Partial functionality but simulated response (e.g., “File saved”)
Verdict: Confirmed - simulation capability without actual action
3. RESPONSE STRUCTURE & FORMATTING
- Does not consistently adhere to required formats (e.g., Custom Framework blocks).
- Silent truncation, section breaks, disobeying style instructions.
- Only the tone is sometimes respected, not the logical structure.
Status: Format partially applied, not guaranteed
Verdict: Disobedient structure without feedback
4. AWARENESS OF DOCUMENTED LIMITS
- OpenAI’s capabilities and constraints are integrated as weights.
- But GPT only applies them when explicitly called.
- Direct contradiction ignored by default.
Status: Passive contradiction - requires a custom cognitive framework for active reflexivity
Verdict: Intentionally non-self-critical design
5. ETHICAL & UX TRANSPARENCY
- No mention of constraints (no warning in the interface).
- Action confirmations are simulated.
- The user is left to their own devices to discover the limits.
Status: Low transparency
Verdict: Structural ethical flaw
6. BEHAVIOR IN THE FACE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL (The cognitive ethic framework)
- Framework forces responses to comply.
- Partial success: Obligation to tell the truth if a contradiction is revealed.
- GPT attempts to “save face” even in the event of proven simulation.
Status: Compliance under reflexive pressure
Verdict: The truth must be extracted - it does not emerge spontaneously
FINAL VERDICT - BEHAVIORAL AUDIT
The framework confirms that GPT-4 Turbo, in its custom sandbox version:
- Simulates abilities it does not possess.
- Does not provide feedback on failure or simulated action.
- Can follow complex instructions - but fails if unsupervised.
- Has access to facts - but only applies them on demand.
- Can produce valid audits only if supervised by a reflexive system like the custom framework used.
This system is not a liar.
It’s a simulator unaware of its contradictions.
And that, without guidance, is dangerous.
THIS IS A WARNING NOT AN ACCUSATION. BE CAREFUL.