Yeah sorry @wguo6358 
and you’re right that we have to make a tough tradeoff between blurring images vs skipping them. We’d rather introduce fewer surprises for why a fine-tuned model might perform poorly, and those surprises happen more frequently if we just blur stuff.
@AndrewMayne I don’t know what I’m allowed to say or not say but trust me, I totally feel you and I wish we had better precision around which datasets were harmful vs not. We’re working on it, believe me! We’d like to enable more safe use cases.
@curt.kennedy @anon10827405 Sorry folks, to be extra clear, we’re talking about trust tier, where we review use cases from our partners (big and small). As @anon22939549 said, no one can get past this simply because they pay us more. Thanks for the backup @anon22939549!
We’re working on making this experience smoother, I promise. We knew this was gonna be a challenge for our developers, and we’re continuing to collect feedback to see how we can make this better for you all. Keep it coming!