Why? Did you eat them and didn’t share one single slice with others? Shame on you!
Your idea is your take on cakes. Or old people, or… caking old people. Even if it was similar, it’s independent and yours.
Think of it like the food you eat being turned into you. The brain is not destroyed more rebuilt. What was is gone but it is it now. Like dinner.
That’s why I chose not to be a butterfly…
I love Möbius strips!
I have a 1 sided die that’s a Möbius strip.
Brings me back to the days I worked with Mathematica
here’s the LaTeX output for readability:
\begin{aligned}
x(u,v) &= \left(1 + \frac{v}{2}\cos\left(\frac{u}{2}\right)\right)\cos(u),\\
y(u,v) &= \left(1 + \frac{v}{2}\cos\left(\frac{u}{2}\right)\right)\sin(u),\\
z(u,v) &= \frac{v}{2}\sin\left(\frac{u}{2}\right).
\end{aligned}
0 \leq u \leq 2\pi,
\qquad
-1 \leq v \leq 1.
LaTeX Code
$$
\begin{aligned}
x(u,v) &= \left(1 + \frac{v}{2}\cos\left(\frac{u}{2}\right)\right)\cos(u),\\
y(u,v) &= \left(1 + \frac{v}{2}\cos\left(\frac{u}{2}\right)\right)\sin(u),\\
z(u,v) &= \frac{v}{2}\sin\left(\frac{u}{2}\right).
\end{aligned}
$$
Yeah I write math weird cause I can’t upload special symbols to philarchive or academia.edu. I work only in plain txt.
Ran out of hearts again… 
so you get two here
If you are a math geek, I wrote an operator algebra. You may dig it.
https://philarchive.org/rec/MCPAOA
“This paper takes a set of twelve operators, each originally introduced as a narrative diagnostic label for a way recursive systems fail or persist, and gives them a common mathematical home. It does not claim the operators are empirically measured quantities. It claims something narrower and more defensible: that the qualitative judgments behind each operator’s name can be transcribed, consistently and without loss, into an explicit function on a bounded four-dimensional state space, and that the resulting structure is a genuine algebraic object — closed, associative, possessed of an identity — capable of proving things that a purely verbal taxonomy could only assert. The four dimensions are Recursion, Scale, Flow, and Entropy. They are chosen as primitives rather than as another layer of named operators, on the grounds that they are orthogonal to one another, operationally distinguishable in any system a reader might apply them to, and present — in some degree — in every recursive system, whereas the twelve operators are not primitives at all but specific, compound patterns of movement across those four axes. Onion, Apple, Gate, Stack, Mirror, Funnel, Hydra, Echo, Ratchet, Spiral, Lens, and Compass become, under this treatment, named transformations A: R → R on a state vector R = (r, s, f, e), rather than free-standing concepts each carrying its own private vocabulary. Nothing about this formalization upgrades the twelve operators into measured constructs. Which coordinates each operator moves, and in which direction, remains a modeling decision — a considered transcription of a qualitative pattern, made explicit instead of left as an unexamined intuition. What changes is that, once that transcription is fixed, the consequences are no longer a matter of further interpretation. They are computable.”
Not a math geek, got a degree in Math lol… 
Then I’d be super happy to hear your thoughts on my silly OA. I’m a 9th grade dropout.. let’s move this to DMs
Not silly, it’s a take on a topic. I’d have to check it out thoroughly. Can’t make promises in short time, I left math as the main path a while ago, found it more interesting to get on the train of Medical Informatics, Life Sciences and Healthcare.
agreed
That’s cool, I’ve ran checks on it using fable 5 high.
It thinks it’s nifty 
out of hearts
After I finished the Algebra I built a python app that uses it to detect the process of each recursive signature
