Google Pay + rented Vietnamese bank cards being used to farm ChatGPT Plus 1-month trials

Hi OpenAI team,

I want to report a second route to the same result as the UPI + mail.com pattern that was flagged here a few days ago, this time out of Vietnam. As with that thread, I’m keeping this at the pattern level and leaving out the step-by-step so it doesn’t turn into a guide. I have screenshots of the listings and my chats with the sellers and can hand those to Trust & Safety privately.

What I’m seeing

The trial is being started with Google Pay as the payment method rather than a card typed in at checkout. A Google Pay wallet can hold a lot of cards, and as far as I can tell each card added to it counts as a fresh payment method for the trial check. So one operator with one Google account goes through card after card and picks up a new month of Plus each time.

The cards themselves are the interesting part. When sellers run out of their own, they rent cards from middlemen (thương lái, as they’re called locally). These are ordinary debit cards from Vietnamese banks, mostly MB Bank and Vietcombank from what I’ve been told, opened in other people’s names and handed over in batches. They aren’t virtual or prepaid cards, so they presumably don’t trip whatever check catches those. Each one has a real BIN and a different cardholder name.

Nothing here is a one-person trick. The accounts are openly listed in Vietnamese marketplaces and community groups as “ChatGPT Plus 1 tháng” (one month), and the sellers describe the method to buyers without any hesitation.

When I asked a few of them about it, none were worried. One told me, more or less word for word, that they dare OpenAI to fix it. They treat the card supply as unlimited and the trial as a solved problem on their side.

Why it matters

Every farmed account is a month of Plus given away, and because the accounts are resold, the trial is paying for a grey-market subscription business. The people whose names are on the rented cards most likely have no idea what the cards are being used for, and they’re the ones who’d take the hit if anything were ever charged. Legitimate users in Vietnam who pay through Google Pay for real would be the ones facing extra friction if the trial or the wallet option gets pulled. And the gap isn’t specific to Vietnam: any wallet that can front many cards would work the same way.

Suggestions

Tie trial eligibility to the underlying card rather than to the wallet or the email, and cap it at one trial per card fingerprint.

Require a successful small charge or a verified hold on the card before Plus is activated. I’d guess most of the rented cards are empty, so an authorization that actually has to clear would stop a good share of them.

Limit trials per verified phone number and per device, on top of the per-email limit, and rate-limit trial activations per IP and device fingerprint.

Treat “same device or IP, new cardholder name every few days” as a signal. That sequence doesn’t happen with real users.

If the Google Pay checkout skips a verification step that a directly entered Vietnamese card has to go through, that’s probably the gap the sellers are relying on.

Watch Vietnamese resale listings for “ChatGPT Plus 1 tháng”. If the price jumps or the listings dry up, the fix is working. If not, it isn’t.

I’d rather report this than keep watching the listings grow. If there’s a better channel for this (Trust & Safety form, bug bounty), point me to it and I’ll move the details there.

Thanks.

Following up on my report above. One thing I didn’t spell out, and I think it changes how urgent this is: the rented-card supply that this whole trade runs on is illegal in Vietnam, the fines were raised sharply in February, and police are actively going after it. I’m not a lawyer, so treat the summary below as a pointer to the sources at the bottom, not as a legal opinion.

What the law says

Renting, lending, buying or selling payment accounts and bank cards, and opening a card on someone else’s behalf, are prohibited outright under Decree 52/2024 on non-cash payments.

Since 9 February 2026, Decree 340/2025 sets the administrative fine for buying, selling, renting or lending payment accounts at 100 to 150 million VND (roughly USD 4,000 to 6,000) for one to nine accounts, and 150 to 200 million VND for ten or more, with the proceeds confiscated on top. Under the previous decree the range was 40 to 50 million.

At larger scale it becomes a criminal matter. Article 291 of the Penal Code (illegal collection, storage, exchange, trading or disclosure of bank account information) carries fines from 20 to 500 million VND or six months to seven years in prison. The top bracket starts at 200 accounts or 200 million VND in illegal gains.

A separate cybersecurity decree (330/2026, in force since 19 August) adds a fine for the individual who rents out, lends or gives away their own bank account or card details.

And it is being enforced. A week ago nine people were fined close to 800 million VND for trading the details of 34 bank accounts. In May, Da Nang police fined seven people a total of almost 370 million VND for the same thing.

Why that changes the urgency

The sellers I talked to are running on a supply chain of cards opened in other people’s names, which is exactly what Vietnamese regulators and police have spent the last few years cracking down on, because the same rented cards are what scam and money-laundering rings use. The traders typically recruit low-income people to open the accounts, pay them a few hundred thousand dong each, and take the card, the SIM and the banking login.

The person whose name is on the card is the one who gets fined or investigated when it turns up somewhere it shouldn’t. Police here have said plainly that the account holder is liable if an account in their name is used for a crime. By then the seller has moved on to the next batch.

So every farmed month of Plus that gets resold is, in a small way, demand for another rented card. The trial is subsidizing a market that Vietnam has decided is illegal and now punishes with fines many times what the people at the bottom of it were paid.

There’s also a practical angle for OpenAI. I don’t know how a Vietnamese regulator or the cybercrime police would look at a checkout that is accepting these cards at volume, and I’d rather nobody find out the hard way. If this ends up in the Vietnamese press, the headline will be about ChatGPT trials farmed on rented bank cards, and the sellers’ names won’t be in it.

What I’d ask for

Given all that, I think this deserves to jump the usual trial-abuse queue. The two changes from my previous post that would matter most are a real authorization hold on the card before Plus activates, and trial eligibility keyed to the underlying card rather than the wallet. Anything that pushes the cost of a rented card above what a resold month sells for breaks the economics, and that is a low bar.

Sources (in Vietnamese)

Decree 340/2025 fine levels, Vietnam Banks Association: https://vnba.org.vn/vi/tu-ngay-9-2--se-phat-den-250-trieu-dong-neu-cho-thue--muon-tai-khoan-thanh-toan-20513.htm

Decree 340/2025 compared with the old fines: Cá nhân bị phạt đến 200 triệu đồng khi mua bán, cho mượn tài khoản ngân hàng

Prohibited acts under Decree 52/2024, Thai Nguyen police: Cảnh báo vi phạm pháp luật từ mua, bán, cho thuê tài khoản ngân hàng

Article 291 penalty ranges, Quang Ngai police: https://congan.quangngai.gov.vn/danh-muc-san-pham/-tin-tuc-su-kien/canh-bao-vi-pham-phap-luat-lien-quan-hoat-dong-cho-thue-cho-muon-va-mua-ban-tai-khoan-ngan-hang.html

Article 291 brackets: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/hoi-dap-phap-luat/mua-ban-trai-phep-tai-khoan-ngan-hang-bi-phat-bao-nhieu-tien-379611.html

Decree 330/2026: Cho thuê, mượn, tặng tài khoản ngân hàng bị phạt đến 10 triệu đồng

September 2026 case, nine people fined for 34 accounts: Mua, bán trái phép thông tin 34 tài khoản ngân hàng, 9 người bị phạt gần 800 triệu đồng

May 2026 Da Nang case, seven people fined: Xử phạt gần 370 triệu đồng nhóm đối tượng mua bán trái phép tài khoản ngân hàng

How the traders recruit account holders: Triệt phá đường dây mua bán trái phép hơn 300 tài khoản ngân hàng - VnEconomy

Account holder liability, Da Nang police: Xử phạt 91 triệu đồng hai đối tượng mua bán tài khoản ngân hàng trái phép

You’re also a professional seller and you understand this process so well, so tell me, what’s your shop name or username of the bot on Telegram? :joy:

Hmm, i think if i send here, OpenAI will ban me :sweat_smile:

How can a seller denounce another seller :joy: or your service so poor that you have no customers? Haha

Hmm I think you should look to Momo report

Lol what a cesspool

So you are trial abusing and reporting others like wtf

I never understood purpose of free trial there is free mode there is go why waste money give free plus to people who never upgrade but keep abusing this system over and over I see this all the time on Reddit “anyone with an invite link”

No, i already stopped it, now i just a normal user