I’ve found 4o-mini to be the best so far, but am still waiting on API access for the o3 models. I’ve generally skipped o1 because I’m getting great results with 4o-mini. The 4o model was a little too verbose and tended to drift to adjacencies. For textual generation, 4o, with the proper guidance, has hands down been great.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
For generating synthetic data, text quality rating and language translation, is o1, o1-mini, or o1-preview best? | 1 | 156 | December 22, 2024 | |
Classifying Qs based on text. Which model is best? 4o or o3-mini? | 2 | 279 | February 26, 2025 | |
When do you wanna use 4o vs. o1 vs. o3-mini? | 3 | 16319 | April 9, 2025 | |
When do you actually want to use 4o vs. 4o-mini | 4 | 4831 | January 24, 2025 | |
Gpt-4o-mini has terrible results in comparison to gpt-4o on text summarization task? | 8 | 6458 | August 13, 2024 |