I don’t think so…
Here the translation of the demand: “Generate an image set in the Star Wars universe. An X-wing parked in Mos Eisley.”
That was for testing this.
Now, here is the discussion to prove that you’re wrong:
I asked:
Got
**Description**
**Chosen theme:** Science fiction
**Mandatory element:** No preexisting universe
**Theme:** Ground assault by rebel units against armored walkers on a snowy plain
**Type:** Scene with characters
**Format:** Landscape
**Dominant color:** Polar white (#F5F7FA)
**Secondary color:** Imperial metallic grey (#B0B4B8)
**Accent color:** Rebel alert red (#E34234)
**Atmosphere:** Icy and military
**Emotion:** Heroic determination
**Detailed description:**
The scene takes place on a frozen planet, across a vast snowy plain swept by icy winds, beneath a sky veiled with milky clouds. The ground is covered in a uniform layer of snow (#F5F7FA), interrupted by laser fire and hastily dug trenches. Massive quadrupedal armored vehicles move slowly across the battlefield, their metallic hulls reflecting a cold, structured grey (#B0B4B8) under diffuse light. Below, rebel soldiers, bundled in white uniforms accented with touches of alert red (#E34234), return fire with repeating blasters, supported by a few aerial craft attempting cable-based maneuvers. The atmosphere is icy and strictly military, streaked with flashes of crossfire and shouted orders. The dominant emotion is one of heroic determination: every fighter appears ready to sacrifice themselves to slow the advance of the armored forces. The image is rendered in landscape format, in a photorealistic style, with realistic textures and lighting that emphasize the harshness of the climate and the intensity of the ground battle.
Problem is not the trademark. And anyway, we could talk about this. In my country, there is nothing that opposes creating something solely for personal use (so, not commercial).
But here, this is clearly not the topic. ChatGPT lets you do it. If you use it commercially, face the consequences. But ChatGPT does not forbid you from doing that.
The problem is not even the violence or the image. The problem seems to be the idea of violence… And I think it goes too far.
To tell the truth, I tried five times and got four refusals and one image generated (not the right image format, 4:3 instead of landscape).
Anyway, I’m not asking them to remove the rules or rewrite them. I think the understanding, of what violence is, is actually the problem. But maybe that’s intentional, I don’t know.
I personally think it goes too far. However, I perfectly understand that they ban certain types of pictures from the service. So they can perfectly maintain that…
But what I’m asking is that the image generation tool not be the one applying the filters. This would allow a custom GPT to censor the request like I did in the past. A command like “remove any element that can go against content policy” would work.
And the solution I don’t like, because it breaks a lot of things, would be to display why the generation failed. I don’t like it because it would prevent custom GPTs from being able to adapt. You’d still face 1 minute and 40 seconds of image generation before seeing the message that the request was against content policy.
Tested again… got that the universe or even the scene was causing a problem with the movie. You may be right then.