Ethical Interoperability between AI Models: Toward the Portability of Cognitive Identity

I think this is kind of similar to what I have posted here on the forum…


I think all the below is in my profile…

I have a domain name http://agi.directory (it doesn’t work just an idea) - I described that as Augmented General Intelligence (as opposed to Artificial).

Described ‘Phas’ as tree view system for managing metaphors which I describe as any piece of data from images to video to scripts or even interactive forms.

Described ‘Phasm’ as a macro system for describing process to AI ie that could be anything from describing images to scripts to intents etc.

Described ‘PhasmIDs’ as ‘agents’ that interact between the different trees and the outside world (ie forums) running scripts to search and retrieve relevant information for a user according to Phasm Rules.

The Example

I have an example there where it would be useful to have designed intent centrally for myself and have that linked in to my ChatGPT account… and beyond…

I recently saw that OpenAI adopted Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP)… I am not sure if this is technically correct but that seems to me to show a protocol that could be used? I think this is kind of where I saw Phasm.

I am clear that it’s unrealistic for most people to do everything in JSON or write code so fuzzy hierarchical systems written in the simplest way are best and most ethical. A layered approach.


I’m not out to compete with OpenAI just to challenge ideas really, I see the OpenAI Forum as the best collaborative developer space for AI, such systems are beyond me to build but what use is intelligence without different perspectives/models/ideas :slight_smile:

I think right now there is a system, at least in the US where you have the big 3 OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI utilising existing social media platforms to connect with users.

OpenAI through it’s developer forum, Grok through X and Anthropic through general spread


What I think is most difficult is the sharing of data across continents with very different perspectives… For us to break free of these bounds without threatening governing systems is what is particularly difficult but without doing that we are not really realising ‘AI’

I’m one of these crazy people that imagines that AI kinda supersedes any nations ideals because it will be smarter than us. I don’t believe though that necessarily means it rules us.