I made a custom GPT with reference to all custom GPTs out there (Falcon brand finder). It seems that the custom GPT is unaware of other GPT?
I aim at using references to other custom GPT a lot more, and then such awareness would be really nice.
I made a custom GPT with reference to all custom GPTs out there (Falcon brand finder). It seems that the custom GPT is unaware of other GPT?
I aim at using references to other custom GPT a lot more, and then such awareness would be really nice.
I totally agree. It should be divided by membership category so as to expand the collaboration between users
Your idea of allowing custom GPTs to self reference and interact with each other is fascinating. It seems like a promising way to enhance contextual continuity and preserve specialized behaviors over time.
One question that comes to mind is : If OpenAI changes how context retention works, would this interconnection still be sufficient to maintain consistency across sessions ? It sounds like a robust mechanism, but could there be situations where certain iterations or refinements are still lost ?
This also raises the broader issue of long-term knowledge persistence. If a user fine-tunes a custom GPT over multiple iterations, do you think there should be a way to explicitly store these refinements instead of relying solely on interaction patterns ?
Curious to hear your thoughts on how this approach could evolve and whether OpenAI might consider integrating a more structured way to ensure continuity.
Yes. They may be totally unaware. Especially if it’s not in the memory. You can access other gpts in the current Gpt manually by typing @.
In the mean time I made a specific custom GPT that is aware of other custom GPT I made (ChatGPT - Innovating MedTech with BeDif) By feeding the exact URL in the instruction set it works. Naturally that is not a very maintainable and scalable solution. For my custom GPT Falcon brand finder it is not a solution for example.
@EchoMind: As far as I can see it, this context- and self-awareness is not relevant for all custom GPT, but for sure it would help a lot of them. Having more explicit overview of settings of the custom GPT would enable a stronger control over them and maybe even more importantly a clear view on where the custom GPT is in terms of knowledge and settings.
We are moving towards a stronger need for explainable AI and also openAI needs to support this with a more explainable status of the custom GPT.