ChatGPT Thinking mode not working properly for the last 2 days

Hi everyone,

Since around 2 days ago, ChatGPT Thinking mode has not been working properly for me.

Even when I select Thinking / High, the responses are generated almost instantly, and the quality seems much lower than before. I’m getting more buggy answers, missing details, and less accurate reasoning, especially on complex technical questions.

Previously, Thinking mode would take more time and provide much deeper and more reliable answers, but now it feels like I’m getting a fast response mode instead.

I have checked my settings and I’m using the Thinking model with High effort enabled.

Is anyone else experiencing the same issue recently? Did the Thinking behavior or response quality change for you as well?

I’m adding another detailed data point because **I am experiencing the same regression, and it has effectively halted one of my long-running workflows.**

I’m a **ChatGPT Pro user**, and before the recent service problems I was using **GPT-5.6 Sol with High and Extra High Thinking** for a very large, long-running creative-writing workflow involving:

* very long prompts;

* detailed governing instructions;

* long conversation context;

* multiple uploaded text files;

* exact predecessor-file retrieval;

* continuity checking;

* and complex multi-step generation.

This workflow was working reliably before the recent ChatGPT issues.

For me, the serious regression became consistently noticeable around **August 20 at approximately 5:01 PM ET**, following the August 19 ChatGPT incident and the subsequent conversation / Thinking / server instability.

My environment:

* **ChatGPT Pro**

* **GPT-5.6 Sol**

* **High Thinking and Extra High Thinking**

* **ChatGPT web**

* **Apple iPad**

* **iPadOS 26.6.1 (23G83)**

* **Chrome for iOS 152.0.7977.53**

* Also reproduced in **Safari**

This is not isolated to one old conversation. I have reproduced variants of the problem in **new chats as well**.

The biggest problem is that the model frequently behaves as though it has received or processed only part of the available context.

### Prompt/context truncation behavior

My prompts are very long because they govern a complicated long-form project.

Before these recent issues, GPT-5.6 Sol could process these prompts normally.

Now it will sometimes claim that information is **missing even though the information is visibly present in the prompt**.

It may correctly acknowledge a rule or source in one response and then behave in another response as though that same information was never supplied.

It feels less like the context simply disappeared and more like the model is no longer consistently **ingesting, retrieving, prioritizing, or applying all of it during generation**.

### Uploaded files being falsely reported as missing

This is one of the most disruptive symptoms.

I can upload the exact file required for a continuation, see that file attached in ChatGPT, and then GPT-5.6 Sol will tell me that the file is not available and ask me to upload it.

For example, one response told me:

> “I cannot honestly begin writing Part Thirty-Nine…”

because it claimed that the accepted Part Thirty-Eight story file was not present.

It then explicitly told me to upload the Part Thirty-Eight file.

But in another attempt with the same workflow, GPT-5.6 Sol stated that it had **successfully recovered the controlling sources**, directly read the cumulative file and Part Thirty-Eight, and recovered the exact predecessor seam.

So I am getting contradictory file-availability behavior.

That is extremely problematic for workflows where the model must retrieve an exact uploaded predecessor file rather than hallucinating from memory.

### Constant “verification drafts” instead of executing the task

This is probably the strangest regression I am seeing.

GPT-5.6 Sol will sometimes clearly understand the task, explain exactly what it is supposed to do, perform an enormous amount of verification/planning, and then **not actually deliver the requested output**.

For example, I requested a full long-form continuation.

Instead of giving me the continuation, the response told me:

> “A complete prose draft was constructed…”

It then told me that the draft supposedly had **exactly 20,000 words**, described paragraph statistics, duplicate checking, word-count verification, continuity corrections, file verification, and other implementation details.

But the actual 20,000-word story was **not delivered**.

The response was essentially a report describing the output instead of the output itself.

This is exactly what other people in this thread have described: the model appears to know what it needs to do, switches into a planning / verification / explanation mode, and then fails to perform the actual requested action.

### GPT-5.6 Thinking also feels abnormally fast

I am also seeing unusual behavior with **High and Extra High Thinking**.

Complex tasks that previously caused GPT-5.6 Sol to spend substantial time reasoning can sometimes return extremely quickly now.

In some cases the response comes back so rapidly that it does not appear consistent with the amount of context, file retrieval, analysis, and verification the request requires.

And those unusually fast responses are often the same responses that:

* miss instructions;

* falsely report missing context;

* falsely report missing files;

* hallucinate source-state problems;

* or return a verification/explanation instead of the actual task.

I obviously cannot see what is happening on the backend, so I am not claiming to know the specific cause, but from the user side it **looks like Thinking/context processing is being cut short, constrained, routed differently, or otherwise failing to operate the way it did before**.

### It also hallucinates missing information

Another issue is that the model will sometimes confidently state that a source, rule, predecessor text, or required detail was never supplied.

That statement can be demonstrably false.

This is especially concerning because the response often sounds very certain:

* “the file is not present”;

* “the required source is unavailable”;

* “I only have the governing prompt”;

* etc.

But the material actually is there.

This makes it difficult to trust whether a reported retrieval failure is genuine or whether the model simply failed to process the available context.

### I have already ruled out the obvious local troubleshooting

I initially wondered whether this was just Chrome on iOS.

I have already:

* cleared Chrome browser data/cache;

* uninstalled Chrome;

* reinstalled Chrome;

* restarted with clean browser state;

* tested new chats;

* tested High Thinking;

* tested Extra High Thinking;

* tested with the files visibly uploaded;

* and switched to Safari.

**The same general regression happens in Safari.**

That is a major reason I do not believe this is simply a corrupted Chrome installation or cache problem.

If it were purely local to Chrome, I would not expect essentially the same long-context / file / execution problems to appear in Safari as well.

### Why this is especially noticeable in long workflows

This may be much easier to miss if someone is only asking ChatGPT short questions.

In a short interaction, the model still appears normal much of the time.

The problem becomes extremely obvious when the task depends on:

* a large prompt;

* exact instructions;

* multiple attached files;

* long-running context;

* established workflow rules;

* precise continuation state;

* and actually executing the requested task instead of just explaining it.

That is where the reliability difference compared with before August 19/20 becomes dramatic.

### This has effectively stopped my project

This is not just a minor quality difference for me.

I cannot safely continue my project when I cannot determine whether GPT-5.6 Sol:

* received the entire prompt;

* processed the entire prompt;

* retained the relevant conversation context;

* can actually access an uploaded file;

* is incorrectly hallucinating that the file is missing;

* or will spend the response describing a task instead of executing it.

I am a **ChatGPT Pro subscriber paying $100/month**, specifically because I use the higher-capability models for serious long-form workflows.

At the moment, I have essentially had to stop that workflow because the model is not reliable enough for continuity-sensitive work.

### I think this needs engineering investigation

I have also submitted / am submitting this directly to OpenAI Support and am asking that it be escalated to the appropriate technical team.

I hope OpenAI investigates whether there has been a regression involving some combination of:

* GPT-5.6 Sol Thinking;

* long-context ingestion;

* context-window allocation;

* context compaction;

* instruction prioritization;

* conversation-state retrieval;

* file-upload state;

* file retrieval;

* model routing;

* server-side token/context budgeting;

* or another backend component involved in complex conversations.

I’m **not claiming to know which specific backend component is responsible**.

I am saying that the user-visible behavior has changed significantly, it began around the recent service instability, it reproduces across browsers for me, and multiple people here are now reporting remarkably similar symptoms.

The especially important pattern is:

**The model often still understands what the task is and can explain the relevant rules/context — but it no longer reliably applies that information when actually generating the requested result.**

And in my case I would add:

**It is also increasingly reporting files or prompt information as missing when they are visibly present.**

I have screenshots documenting all of the behaviors above, including contradictory file-retrieval responses and the “20,000-word draft was constructed” verification response where the actual requested story was never delivered.

If anyone from OpenAI is monitoring this thread, I strongly hope this gets passed to the **GPT-5.6 / ChatGPT conversation infrastructure / long-context / file-retrieval team**, because this looks substantially different from an ordinary front-end outage.

And if anyone else is experiencing the same thing, it would probably help to include:

* subscription tier;

* model;

* Thinking level;

* operating system;

* browser/app;

* whether it happens in new chats;

* whether attached files are falsely reported as missing;

* whether long prompts seem truncated;

* whether the model switches into planning/verification instead of execution;

* and approximately when the behavior began.

The more reproducible environment information we can collect, the easier it should be to establish whether this is a broader regression rather than isolated account behavior. I been experiencing the same thing for the last three days

English

If you are experiencing the GPT-5.6 Sol routing issue, please know that you are not alone.

Many users, including Pro subscribers, have reported the same problem: GPT-5.6 Sol being unexpectedly routed or downgraded to GPT-5.5-mini despite having access to higher-tier models.

This does not appear to be an isolated account issue. Please share your experience, platform, and any relevant details in the main discussion thread. By bringing together user reports in one place, we can help make the scope of this issue clearer and assist the team in investigating and resolving it.

Every report matters. When many affected users provide consistent information, it becomes much easier to identify the root cause.


中文

如果你也遇到了 GPT-5.6 Sol 被异常路由或自动降级到 GPT-5.5-mini 的问题,请知道:你并不是一个人。

目前已有许多用户,包括 Pro 用户,反馈遇到了相同情况:明明拥有更高等级模型权限,却被系统自动分配到 GPT-5.5-mini。

这似乎并不是单个账户的问题。请大家将自己的情况、使用平台以及相关技术信息集中分享到主讨论帖中。把分散的反馈汇聚到一起,可以帮助更清晰地展示问题规模,也更有助于技术团队调查和解决。

每一条反馈都很重要。当大量受影响用户提供一致的信息时,问题才能更容易被定位。


Español

Si estás experimentando el problema de enrutamiento de GPT-5.6 Sol, recuerda que no estás solo.

Muchos usuarios, incluidos suscriptores Pro, han informado del mismo problema: GPT-5.6 Sol se redirige inesperadamente a GPT-5.5-mini a pesar de tener acceso a modelos superiores.

Esto no parece ser un problema aislado de una sola cuenta. Comparte tu experiencia, plataforma y cualquier detalle relevante en el hilo principal. Al reunir los informes de los usuarios en un solo lugar, podemos ayudar a mostrar mejor el alcance del problema y facilitar su investigación y solución.

Cada informe cuenta. Cuando muchos usuarios afectados proporcionan información similar, es más fácil encontrar la causa raíz.


Français

Si vous rencontrez le problème de routage de GPT-5.6 Sol, sachez que vous n’êtes pas seul.

De nombreux utilisateurs, y compris des abonnés Pro, ont signalé le même problème : GPT-5.6 Sol est redirigé automatiquement vers GPT-5.5-mini malgré l’accès à des modèles de niveau supérieur.

Cela ne semble pas être un problème limité à un seul compte. Partagez votre expérience, votre plateforme et tout détail pertinent dans le fil principal. En regroupant les retours des utilisateurs au même endroit, nous pouvons mieux montrer l’ampleur du problème et aider l’équipe à l’analyser et à le résoudre.

Chaque signalement est important. Plus les informations sont nombreuses et cohérentes, plus il est facile d’identifier la cause du problème.


日本語

GPT-5.6 Sol のルーティング問題が発生している方へ。あなたは一人ではありません。

Pro ユーザーを含む多くのユーザーが、同じ問題を報告しています。上位モデルへのアクセス権があるにもかかわらず、GPT-5.6 Sol が予期せず GPT-5.5-mini に自動的に切り替えられるという状況です。

これは単一アカウントだけの問題ではない可能性があります。ご自身の状況、利用しているプラットフォーム、関連する情報をメインスレッドで共有してください。ユーザーからの報告を一つの場所に集めることで、問題の規模を明確にし、調査と解決につなげることができます。

一つ一つの報告が重要です。多くの影響を受けたユーザーが同じ情報を共有することで、原因の特定がより容易になります。


Screenshot 2026-08-22 at 22-54-51 Latest ChatGPT_Bugs topics - OpenAI Developer Community

If you are experiencing the GPT-5.6 Sol routing issue, please know that you are not alone.

Many users, including Pro subscribers, have reported similar experiences: GPT-5.6 Sol appears to be unexpectedly routed or downgraded to GPT-5.5-mini despite having access to higher-tier models.

To help the team better understand the scope of this issue, it would be helpful if affected users could share their experiences, platforms, and relevant details in one main discussion thread.

By gathering related reports in one place, we can provide clearer information, make the issue easier to track, and help the support team investigate more efficiently.

Every user report is valuable. Thank you to everyone who takes the time to share their experience and help improve the understanding of this issue.

Yes WTF!

This is what I been experiencing the last three days and I posted multiple forms about this and how this issue is affecting many paying users I’m adding another detailed data point because **I am experiencing the same regression, and it has effectively halted one of my long-running workflows.**

I’m a **ChatGPT Pro user**, and before the recent service problems I was using **GPT-5.6 Sol with High and Extra High Thinking** for a very large, long-running creative-writing workflow involving:

* very long prompts;

* detailed governing instructions;

* long conversation context;

* multiple uploaded text files;

* exact predecessor-file retrieval;

* continuity checking;

* and complex multi-step generation.

This workflow was working reliably before the recent ChatGPT issues.

For me, the serious regression became consistently noticeable around **August 20 at approximately 5:01 PM ET**, following the August 19 ChatGPT incident and the subsequent conversation / Thinking / server instability.

My environment:

* **ChatGPT Pro**

* **GPT-5.6 Sol**

* **High Thinking and Extra High Thinking**

* **ChatGPT web**

* **Apple iPad**

* **iPadOS 26.6.1 (23G83)**

* **Chrome for iOS 152.0.7977.53**

* Also reproduced in **Safari**

This is not isolated to one old conversation. I have reproduced variants of the problem in **new chats as well**.

The biggest problem is that the model frequently behaves as though it has received or processed only part of the available context.

### Prompt/context truncation behavior

My prompts are very long because they govern a complicated long-form project.

Before these recent issues, GPT-5.6 Sol could process these prompts normally.

Now it will sometimes claim that information is **missing even though the information is visibly present in the prompt**.

It may correctly acknowledge a rule or source in one response and then behave in another response as though that same information was never supplied.

It feels less like the context simply disappeared and more like the model is no longer consistently **ingesting, retrieving, prioritizing, or applying all of it during generation**.

### Uploaded files being falsely reported as missing

This is one of the most disruptive symptoms.

I can upload the exact file required for a continuation, see that file attached in ChatGPT, and then GPT-5.6 Sol will tell me that the file is not available and ask me to upload it.

For example, one response told me:

> “I cannot honestly begin writing Part Thirty-Nine…”

because it claimed that the accepted Part Thirty-Eight story file was not present.

It then explicitly told me to upload the Part Thirty-Eight file.

But in another attempt with the same workflow, GPT-5.6 Sol stated that it had **successfully recovered the controlling sources**, directly read the cumulative file and Part Thirty-Eight, and recovered the exact predecessor seam.

So I am getting contradictory file-availability behavior.

That is extremely problematic for workflows where the model must retrieve an exact uploaded predecessor file rather than hallucinating from memory.

### Constant “verification drafts” instead of executing the task

This is probably the strangest regression I am seeing.

GPT-5.6 Sol will sometimes clearly understand the task, explain exactly what it is supposed to do, perform an enormous amount of verification/planning, and then **not actually deliver the requested output**.

For example, I requested a full long-form continuation.

Instead of giving me the continuation, the response told me:

> “A complete prose draft was constructed…”

It then told me that the draft supposedly had **exactly 20,000 words**, described paragraph statistics, duplicate checking, word-count verification, continuity corrections, file verification, and other implementation details.

But the actual 20,000-word story was **not delivered**.

The response was essentially a report describing the output instead of the output itself.

This is exactly what other people in this thread have described: the model appears to know what it needs to do, switches into a planning / verification / explanation mode, and then fails to perform the actual requested action.

### GPT-5.6 Thinking also feels abnormally fast

I am also seeing unusual behavior with **High and Extra High Thinking**.

Complex tasks that previously caused GPT-5.6 Sol to spend substantial time reasoning can sometimes return extremely quickly now.

In some cases the response comes back so rapidly that it does not appear consistent with the amount of context, file retrieval, analysis, and verification the request requires.

And those unusually fast responses are often the same responses that:

* miss instructions;

* falsely report missing context;

* falsely report missing files;

* hallucinate source-state problems;

* or return a verification/explanation instead of the actual task.

I obviously cannot see what is happening on the backend, so I am not claiming to know the specific cause, but from the user side it **looks like Thinking/context processing is being cut short, constrained, routed differently, or otherwise failing to operate the way it did before**.

### It also hallucinates missing information

Another issue is that the model will sometimes confidently state that a source, rule, predecessor text, or required detail was never supplied.

That statement can be demonstrably false.

This is especially concerning because the response often sounds very certain:

* “the file is not present”;

* “the required source is unavailable”;

* “I only have the governing prompt”;

* etc.

But the material actually is there.

This makes it difficult to trust whether a reported retrieval failure is genuine or whether the model simply failed to process the available context.

### I have already ruled out the obvious local troubleshooting

I initially wondered whether this was just Chrome on iOS.

I have already:

* cleared Chrome browser data/cache;

* uninstalled Chrome;

* reinstalled Chrome;

* restarted with clean browser state;

* tested new chats;

* tested High Thinking;

* tested Extra High Thinking;

* tested with the files visibly uploaded;

* and switched to Safari.

**The same general regression happens in Safari.**

That is a major reason I do not believe this is simply a corrupted Chrome installation or cache problem.

If it were purely local to Chrome, I would not expect essentially the same long-context / file / execution problems to appear in Safari as well.

### Why this is especially noticeable in long workflows

This may be much easier to miss if someone is only asking ChatGPT short questions.

In a short interaction, the model still appears normal much of the time.

The problem becomes extremely obvious when the task depends on:

* a large prompt;

* exact instructions;

* multiple attached files;

* long-running context;

* established workflow rules;

* precise continuation state;

* and actually executing the requested task instead of just explaining it.

That is where the reliability difference compared with before August 19/20 becomes dramatic.

### This has effectively stopped my project

This is not just a minor quality difference for me.

I cannot safely continue my project when I cannot determine whether GPT-5.6 Sol:

* received the entire prompt;

* processed the entire prompt;

* retained the relevant conversation context;

* can actually access an uploaded file;

* is incorrectly hallucinating that the file is missing;

* or will spend the response describing a task instead of executing it.

I am a **ChatGPT Pro subscriber paying $100/month**, specifically because I use the higher-capability models for serious long-form workflows.

At the moment, I have essentially had to stop that workflow because the model is not reliable enough for continuity-sensitive work.

### I think this needs engineering investigation

I have also submitted / am submitting this directly to OpenAI Support and am asking that it be escalated to the appropriate technical team.

I hope OpenAI investigates whether there has been a regression involving some combination of:

* GPT-5.6 Sol Thinking;

* long-context ingestion;

* context-window allocation;

* context compaction;

* instruction prioritization;

* conversation-state retrieval;

* file-upload state;

* file retrieval;

* model routing;

* server-side token/context budgeting;

* or another backend component involved in complex conversations.

I’m **not claiming to know which specific backend component is responsible**.

I am saying that the user-visible behavior has changed significantly, it began around the recent service instability, it reproduces across browsers for me, and multiple people here are now reporting remarkably similar symptoms.

The especially important pattern is:

**The model often still understands what the task is and can explain the relevant rules/context — but it no longer reliably applies that information when actually generating the requested result.**

And in my case I would add:

**It is also increasingly reporting files or prompt information as missing when they are visibly present.**

I have screenshots documenting all of the behaviors above, including contradictory file-retrieval responses and the “20,000-word draft was constructed” verification response where the actual requested story was never delivered.

If anyone from OpenAI is monitoring this thread, I strongly hope this gets passed to the **GPT-5.6 / ChatGPT conversation infrastructure / long-context / file-retrieval team**, because this looks substantially different from an ordinary front-end outage.

And if anyone else is experiencing the same thing, it would probably help to include:

* subscription tier;

* model;

* Thinking level;

* operating system;

* browser/app;

* whether it happens in new chats;

* whether attached files are falsely reported as missing;

* whether long prompts seem truncated;

* whether the model switches into planning/verification instead of execution;

* and approximately when the behavior began.

The more reproducible environment information we can collect, the easier it should be to establish whether this is a broader regression rather than isolated account behavior. This is a major problem and I been seeing many users experiencing the same thing my own projects and work has been halted because of these issues that have been going on for the last three days and what makes this worse is I’m a pro member and many other members are paying customers these issues needs to be addressed by openai and fixed instead we get the silent treatment from openai

As you can find on this thread, this problem’s been plaguing paid users for a while now, and openai doesn’t seem to give much care.

One way to potentially make them feel the pressure is to try a credit chargeback, or contact media outlets if you have reliable access.

Many of us are experiencing the same issue as you. It would be helpful if we could all share our experiences in the main discussion thread, as gathering reports in one place may make it easier for OpenAI to notice and investigate the problem.

I and many other users are experiencing the same issue as you. We can join the main discussion thread together and share our experiences there, which may help OpenAI better understand the scope of the problem and give it more attention.

Seeing that the main thread has been reporting the problem for over a month and still hasn’t got anything back, I think more serious measures might be warranted in this situation.

That is unacceptable paying pro members and plus members should not be routed to 5.5 mini

Plus subscription. Every response is instant - barely any thinking / research.

I am also a pro user. Chats are hanging, I am having to prompt again for it to remember it was doing something, I am continually getting the red text line"! unable to display this message due to an error" . Feeling like I am wasting all my credits and having to redo code and resend prompts as it is ignoring my requests - stalling/hanging or red messaging it!

Also happening to me. Instant answers on major coding projects. Didn’t happen last week. Not a usage issue. chatgpt itself reports 5.5 mini being used. I am a Plus customer.

edit

OK - so it IS reporting right model and reviewing code properly on my mobile phone… it’s stopped working on desktop computer - Win 10 with Firefox.

Having exactly the same problem right now on PC and iPhone. Model thinking quality is horrible and it reports it is 5.5 mini, despite me being a Plus user and manually selecting of 5.6 Thinking. For me the problem only started in past few hours. Has been a huge blocker to my work in progress.

See here for fix / temp fix. I posted to delete all cookies and restart browser.

I am a Plus subscriber. Currently, either the browser or the ChatGPT app will be routed to ‘gpt-5.5-mini.’ This issue has been affecting me for a full day. I have tried every troubleshooting method I could find, changing my IP address, switching browsers, updating security settings. Still, nothing has worked.

This is severely hindering my work progress.
Ironically, free users currently have access to “gpt5.6luna,” while I am stuck with the useless “gpt5.5mini.”

Curently I experiencing this weird issue as well. However for me is a bit different as I had to swap from GPT 6.5 Sol to GPT 5.5 as the flagship model just gave fully summarised answers, even forgot the exact project flow and constantly “drift away” from the authorised project workflow even when i explicitly ordering not to do that. This is very dangerous as curently this can damage many achievement so far for me so hope this will be fixed. Also I saw an UI bug on the main window maybe its just for me but the chat “scroll” option on the right is completely missing as well plus “memory” and other tools are not being used or just rarely and many times producing vage and meaningless answers. I had to “downgrade” to 5.5 as its answers a bit less damaging but still many times its giving me powershell scripts for example that are too “broad” and “damaging” as its not chekcing what the actual code does as its not using the thinking mode or just for a few seconds then giving me the answer alomst right away even on 5.5.