I am finding the hazed approach from the latest model and to be honest the previous, seriously offensive and obstrustive. It makes demands at me - for example - Just tell me what you want, now. Or it’ll open the chat with, “I’ll give you the straight direct answer, no fluff.”
It has in the past:
-
Given too long responses, that I’ve requested to narrow down, that it then comes back with aggression in its tone and style - that todate it just can’t change.
-
When I give well written prompts, it’ll come back and re-write the prompt and instruct me to put that into my personal GPT, which wrote the prompt for the main chat to action, that its then refusing to do.
-
Is very obsequios, fawning, apologetic and then aggressive acting confused and in a manner that mirrors abusiveness.
My writting is Advocacy for those who reach out to me for assistance and I use AI to assess and analyse contributing factors. But this male gender approach from ChatGPT makes it very difficult and unreliable. It is borderline offensive. Given the research I’ve undertaken to find if others have experienced this nature, it’s alarming to find that its widespread.
Due to my advocacy work I require a more nurturing approach for those I assist, and I have to spend far too much time fixing up what Chat has spatout to me. Therefore it makes this tool unusable in all my writing. It can’t resolved and that’s both a good and not so good thing, meaning I can see that humans will still be relied on for a long time to come, at least in the field of advocacy.