No, that is a ChatGPT needs an adult model point. The vast majority of ChatGPT users want adult content.
Then stop beating me over the head with the status quo.
I don’t think it is a vast majority… this forum has over a million people and what 5 of us in this chat? I would pay for a 18+ model but I am against making chat gpt adults only imo kids have the most to learn from this tech even over adult novelists and game designers…
You cannot seriously think that the few people reading this thread represent all the users who want adult content. All that says is that not many people are reading the forums.
Well I’ve been in this forum a bit I have read over 14 days of data so I have a grasp on demographics
You have read 2 hours and who is the vast majority? There are adult services beyond OpenAI…
You are wrong. To prove it, look at how content is created outside ChatGPT. Thousands of R-Rated books and movies are created every year.
You are asserting that content creators only want to create content for PG13 audiences. That is incorrect.
Is there 1000s of r rated pg13 movies?
No I am asserting the tool you choose never claimed to be adult oriented
4o has search just ask it what tools are best for you? Instead of idk insisting they change TOS because you are an adult novelist…
As always OpenAI I so would pay for a 18+ model with separate tos…
And for the umpteenth time, I’m never saying it did. I’m saying that a creative tool NEEDS that option. Most creatives cannot work effectively in a PG-13 space.
This conversation is over if you can’t understand the value of making adult content available to creatives. We have a fundamental disagreement that will never be reconciled.
What’s baffling is that you turn right around and say we need ChatGPT 18+. YES. WE DO! You’re simply regurgitating my request and insisting I’m misreading the TOS because I’m suggesting a change to the status quo.
1 Like
And for the seems like a 1000 times you say how dumb it is a pg13 tool can’t make adult content… it indeed needs it but it can’t be done like you want…
No, I’m saying it’s “dumb” that this model ever existed to begin with. It’s a dumb model. It doesn’t work for most creatives. Either change it or create a new product.
2 Likes
No because they focused on education at first. That’s why pg13 and general audience. But I 100% agree we need a 18+ model
At this second these models are being used by 10000s of 13+ users schools have adopted GPT tech , teachers introducing it to classes world wide … it’s a really big tool for students 13+
Yes, they focused on education first, but now they are marketing to creatives.
The model is so dumb it trips warnings for things related to anatomy, physiology, etc. 13+ is clueless, overly restrictive, and does not even match the life experiences of the average 13-year-old. It’s something for a company to hide behind to avoid spending money on changes their users want. “Oh you want something new? Read the TOS idiot!”
Look, I’m saying we need a solution, and I don’t really care how it’s implemented. I, personally, don’t understand why adding age verification to the current product is such a bad idea, but I’m all for a separate 18+ product, too.
Not really though they say it is a chat bot that can do general things like lists and brain storm. But I agree we need a separate 18+ model 100%
I build ChatGPT store gpt, all my work has to follow the 13+ rule… laws etc will make it worse. It is a really deep topic I have been having for 8 months…
And I am a user like you a team developer business account I’m games inc
Yes, really. It is being advertised and marketed as a creative tool.
Yes but for 13+ I’m unhappy to say. It all says 13+ to use
At any rate I doubt this will happen anytime soon I wish you luck my friend 
“I’m unhappy to say.” That makes two of us.
1 Like
Just for the record, I canceled and switched to Sudowrite. I’ll consider returning when ChatGPT has a product for adults.
1 Like