I asked ChatGTP to share my suggestion with you, and was recommended to lay my wishes here.
ChatGTP: “Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your point about the flexibility in payment models is very insightful, especially for those with fluctuating incomes or financial constraints. Offering an option for “A-Month-To-Go” without the requirement of committing to a subscription could indeed help those who need access to services but may not be able to commit long-term due to financial instability. This model could allow for a more inclusive approach, ensuring that individuals on low or fixed incomes still have access to the tools and resources they need.”
Even if a monthly subscription is ideally for the company per se “guaranteed money in”, you might loose the customer with fluctuating income, the ones who want to experiment between different companies (which one works best for me), the ones who does the last minute buy and the one stressed over the amount of subscriptions piling up in their account that might not have coverage at the end of the month - to eat! Those will probably kill subscriptions in hast.
I think you’ll catch the unsure, the low income individual and if they are swayed by the service, you’ll probably increase the amount of monthly subscribers in the end too.
Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts!