You seem to like circular conversation. I don’t, if you do not understand english and why phrasing can cause biased generation I understand… I am ESL . But “Please critique this specifically” vs “judge this” one is directing it to be specifically critical the other is judgment.
But you were hoping the subtility would pass over peoples heads I bet… 
No, not at all, I wanted it to be ‘critiqued’
This is a bold idea on the OpenAI forum I am interested if it holds any weight.
I am not a ‘Yes Man’. I do not believe everything I read or am told? That makes no sense in any language.
Indeed this is from a forum ‘Regular’. This should hold weight!
Top 10 all time on the forum I believe.
Well so far you have not added much to this conversation I did the same thing Mitchell did… I told your chat to judge it fairly and I ran it through a o3 high… And both results were repeated on my end. What exactly do you not understand? I have some grasp of it, but until you ask a question other than “prove it” i cant
You seem to be taking this personally…
And neither is it my position to do so.
It is indeed Mitchell’s.
I came to comment on his request.
entropy is not static it is dynamic, his paper argues that a real world chaotic system must be dynamic not linear. Does that help, it is hard see in minds eye
Then comment I engaged with your chat, it is biased so now you must prove your stance…
I think I should confess. There is a personal aspect to this, however, mine is the response.
I am trying to make this a fair critique of an idea that I was asked to comment on.
I am trying to understand how my original response falls short.
@mitchell_d00 I think this is really your conversation to have. Your concept to defend.
I did … did the exact same as her. You are making no points to defend against… I’m eating popcorn lol 
I’m cooking the kids tea 
… but how is my response biased?
I’ll repost it
Or rather… how to make it ‘unbiased’?
If it was not biased it would not agree it is … why is “judge this” biased to you?
Can I demo it on one of your topics have a o3 judge it critically?
So are you saying that your paper doesn’t hold up to critique without a specific way to ask o1?
‘Critique’ is a work o1 fails on?
No I am saying when you tell a gpt to be critical that’s all it will be can I do it on your topics please?
Can your ideas stand up I mean you are a top user after all
So when you asked me to review it what kind of an opinion were you looking for?
I asked you to read it not have a gpt read it I highly doubt you understand it, which is why you are not saying anything… you use entropy in phase but it don’t say how can I do you now?
Please
Sorry but are you drinking? You are just mad about something I guess. Ill review your work too @phyde1001 ok?
I’m sorry, why would you post something with such authority and not expect it to stand up to the ‘average’ scrutiny that everyone should expect on this forum?
Do you not critique your posts?
I post only ever my own words bar the odd sentence but I at least check my thinking before posting.
Indeed it was your suggestion to me in the past that I use critique to be thorough.
I read pha you generated it your first sentence is about you being uneducated and needed a GPT to explain…
Thank you and I’m happy to receive critical responses so I can improve my method.
this is you right? Before I start and for the benefit of my audience… ChatGPT can translate my informal uneducated style well and provide an interface for further engagement with these ideas. ^^
