Approximating Natural Science Concepts

Engine: Curie / Response length 600 /temperature 0.6 / Top P 0.7 / Frecuency penanlty 0.05 / Presence penalty 0.05 / Best of 1

API: OpenAI API

This API give you greats definition (English and Spanish) aboud complex concepts, words or ideas.

It works with all range of topic in natural science: biology, phisic, chemestry, hidraulics even medicine or famous people like Marie Curie, among others.

Also this API conbine three hability of the GPT-3 model: Question-Answer or definition; translation; and veracity. The biggest negative point is that it needs a big prompt to work properly.

I have tried with complex and notably diferent concepts and I am surprised with results.

What are your opinions? And what potential do you see to use tools like GPT-3 for this purpose? I personally see many possibilities.

One example:
Q: Photosynthesis

English: Photosynthesis is the process by which plants and some bacteria capture energy from sunlight, using chlorophyll as an antenna to absorb photons. This energy is used to make carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water, using the energy-storing chemical ATP. The light-absorbing pigments are called chlorophylls, which are the basis of the green color of plants. The first step in photosynthesis is the capture of light energy by pigments in the chloroplasts of the plant, which is called primary photophosphorylation. The light-absorbing pigments are called chlorophylls, which are the basis of the green color of plants. The first step in photosynthesis is the capture of light energy by pigments in the chloroplasts of the plant, which is called primary photophosphorylation.

1 Like

Thanks a lot of your opinion. I am completely agree with you so I have change a little the topic.

I am research and natural environmental engineer. I understand about different areas of natural science, such a biology, as you said, and I have comprove a litle sample of responses. But, is totally true that definitions give by this API are stochastics aproximations and, moreover, only one person can’t comprove al posible response in the natural science area.

As a conclusion to your answer, it would be very interesting to have the participation of specialists to check specific definitions in specific areas.

Again, thank you very much.

1 Like