I talked about a similar topic recently on my show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__0smuR6HLA&t=1381s). I developed a plugin that has been live in the plugin store for months. It was an interesting exercise and certainly fun to make (It’s the ‘I am rich’ plugin) but without a way to monetize a plugin, I’m not sure what motivation there is for developers to make plugins. Then OpenAI released GPT-4 vision, then turbo and how many plugins did that render obsolete? Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they are working on the monetization issue when it comes to motivation, but what happens when developers work to create GPTs that are then rendered obsolete in a matter of months by the next iteration of the foundation model? I don’t think this is necessarily an issue of developers only creating thin wrappers, I think the technology is just moving too fast for the platform.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A Pragmatic Approach to Custom GPTs: Why I Chose Airtable Over Building a Store | 31 | 4057 | November 14, 2023 | |
What categories of custom gpts do you think have commercial potential? | 16 | 1567 | February 16, 2024 | |
GPTs discussion - Can you really make money? | 34 | 19395 | April 21, 2025 | |
Is it still worth it to develop and maintain GPTs? | 14 | 1127 | September 24, 2024 | |
Anyone actually figured out how to monetize Custom GPTs outside the official store? | 16 | 413 | May 25, 2025 |